Thursday, August 6, 2015

Making Climate Change Come Faster

All you need is a cost analysis.  What does climate change cost me (i.e. nothing) and what do I gain (i.e. removal of a number of profoundly worthless states).  The value is clear.

Florida

Contributes nothing more than hideous t-shirts, illegal Oxycontin and cocaine.  Climate change wipes out a bunch of dope dealers so how is this a tragedy.


Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana

Nothing comes from these states other than voodoo, perverted things to do with crawdads, and more drugs.  Again, no tragedy when they sink.

Note:  all of these states are huge welfare burdens insofar as they require far more Federal funds than they return in tax dollars from the state.  Sink those pinko socialists.


Texas

The State of Texas was under the ocean for thousands of years and the world was improved in no measurable way by drying it out.  No tragedy in sending this one back under the water either.


California

The call is tougher with California as the state produces some really godawful music but it's got the coolest trees anywhere in the Sequoia forests.  Maybe we can work a compromise on this one:  sink the music and keep the trees.


Oregon / Washington

It doesn't matter what happens.  They will be too stoned to notice.  They eat chocolate reefer candy.  We don't care what happens to stoners who do this.


Washington D.C.

So long as this one stays underwater until the bubbles stop coming up, most of the problems in the world will be solved in a matter of minutes.  The Constitution is in a water-tight case and will be safe.  Politicians can be easily replaced, ideally with honest ones this time.


New York City

There is another tough call with this one as wiping out Broadway and Harlem is too much but what else should you keep from New York.  The big win is when the water shorts out Wall Street and the computers fail over to their back-up systems ... in New Jersey ... which are also flooded.  Que sera, sera.


Carolinas

Is this important?


Someone was bent the other day when I said building a hokey skyscraper after 9/11 was incredibly boring but what do you expect when you get the most boring people on the planet to do it:  architects.  Push a button on an architect and you'll get another metal and glass skyscraper every time.  These are fundamentally boring people.

Elon Musk works with magnets and superconductors for anti-grav while the architects play with Lego blocks.  Imagine anti-grav in combination with construction.  Musk is using the technology right now ... and architects still build skyscrapers.  Oh yes, Claude.  It's a big one.  Really.  Biggest I ever saw, honest.


What do you get with buildings with anti-grav ... I'll tell you what you get:  buildings which don't give any kind of a damn how high the water rises.  Give your anti-grav gizmo a little more power and raise your construction a bit higher ... end of water problem.


What do they do?  I'll tell you what they do.  They build more nuclear submarines.  Presumably at some point the builders will be beset by mobs demanding, hey, Einstein, the problem isn't getting into the water but rather staying the hell out of it.  Thanks for the assist.

No comments: