The roster for Sanders doesn't raise any concerns and is typical for what I would expect to see for a candidate who has not been corrupted by big-money interests.
Clinton gives all the contrast you need as her two biggest contributors are banks with one of them being Goldman Sachs which did such crooked business with Greece. Where she gets off calling herself a Democrat is unimaginable as she makes a show of women's issues but there's only one donor in the list which gives any kind of a rat's ass about issues for women.
We don't know what Emily's List may be but we're sure of one thing from her PAC: she will make a bundle from it ... administrative costs, don'tcha know.
But then Donald Trump is accusing Mexicans of being rapists while at the same time being accused of rape by his ex-wife. Sleaze abounds and who is the worst is tough to tell. As to who on the GOP Clown Car is the best ... well ... it's a pointless question.
Maybe Americans will vote for honesty this time and Sanders really does have a chance. It would surprise the hell out of me given the massive corruption in the country but it could happen.
2 comments:
Labor unions are not corrupt. Not a ringing endorsement. But he might be the least dishonest in the field
Here on the left we see America was strong when unions were strong so we may have a little less problem with that endorsement. The contrast with Clinton is striking as it's not so much are they in the same political party but are they in the same political planet.
Post a Comment