Friday, October 10, 2014

Malala for the Nobel Peace Prize

They will never do worse than picking Obama on a Nobel Peace Prize.  I imagine we agree on that much.

As to Malala, she's a sweet pick and she's been gutsy plus given some good speeches but I see her more as a symbol than someone who has paid the dues.  I understand she got shot but that's not Nobel Prize work, that's living in a bullshit world stuff.  What she has done after puts her in-class but I really don't think there's enough of it and the Committee's pick is not that brave.

Picking Pope Francis would have been a flat-hand slap of America's face for brazen materialism, blah, blah.  That would have been a nervy pick but, as with Malala, he still doesn't have a big history. He's given some cool speeches and thrown out some massively-cool soundbites but, in my view, there needs to be more time-in-grade.

Edward Snowden is my other favorite as he could easily have taken a bullet for what he did and he still may.  That single action brought about a tremendous change in awareness, although with relatively little activity to rectify, a problem that runs far out of control.  Picking him would also have been a brave move as America would have been burning over it.

There are others on the favorite list and one was a doctor who has worked very long years against disease in Africa.  No question his dues are paid.  And so on.

The kid is a safe pick, a sweet pick, but I don't think the best one.

No comments: