Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Bring a Butterfly Net for the Self-Inflicted Defenestration of the Democratic Party

We all enjoyed the defenestration of the lover of Edward the Longhanks' son after he attempted to give the King his military advice.  In fact, we recommend defenestration for all of the military advisers in America and for largely the same reason.  Ref:  "Braveheart"

Ed:  for being gay?

Nah as they happen to be gay but their hallmark is incompetence.

Ed:  they're too lame to even give up a reach-around?

The very same lot of misfits and miscreants,  mate.

Ref:  "Full Metal Jacket" with Gunnery Sergeant Hartman

Ed:  what does he know about being gay?

Probably nothin' but he's the one to ask the questions around here, Private.


Hardly anything can touch the Democratic Party for incompetence anymore and some say it will be at least ten years before it's possible to elect another Democrat after what neoliberal Centrists did to the party ... and those Nobel laureates still don't get it.  (Observer:  DNC Struggles, DCCC Ignores Progressives for Wall Street)

While the DNC has repelled progressives, voters, and even the wealthy donors that new DNC Chair Tom Perez was instilled to appease, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) is abandoning progressives to shift the party further to the right. The DCCC received criticism for pouring funds and resources into Georgia special election congressional candidate Jon Ossoff while ignoring Bernie Sanders-backed candidates in special elections in Montana and Kansas. Ossoff’s campaign received over $23 million in campaign funds, making it the most expensive congressional election in history. His election was supposed to prove that fiscally conservative neo-liberals running in wealthy suburbs was the key to Democrats’ recovery. Even though Ossoff came up short, the DCCC is doubling down on running Republican-lite candidates.

- Observer

They tried to Clinton that Osoff into office and he failed, largely the same way.  When it looks just like a Republican, why not just vote Republican.  Poof, he's gone.


It wasn't Hillary but rather Bill Clinton who started the neoliberal downward slide but Hillary Clinton has managed to make herself the featured attraction.

In a May interview with CNN's Christine Amanpour, Clinton said: "I was on the way to winning until a combination of Jim Comey's letter on Oct. 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me and got scared off."

CNN:  Chuck Schumer just threw Hillary Clinton under the bus

Note 1:  everyone is on the way to winning ... until they fuckin' lose.

Note 2:  being thrown under a bus derives from the mindlessness of corpspeak.  Sound corporate if you can; sound like an empty-headed, shadipated fool with no more imagination than the average quart of 10-W-30 motor oil.


The Rockhouse is starting to admire Clinton's squamate character and she's so evil we're starting to love her.  She so brazenly lies about the source of her emails and the actual content of them rolls off her like rain from any damn lizard.

Note:  squamate is characterized by having scales (i.e. lizard-like).

Nothing released by WikiLeaks has ever been subsequently proven false and Clinton didn't say they weren't true; she only said they were scary.  However, we seriously doubt they were scary for anyone else since she was the only one with anything to lose by the revelation in her own words of what an evil, conniving horror she was off-stage.  She wasn't exactly a bowl of tea time sugar on-stage, for that matter.

Her own emails demolished any idea of Hillary Clinton as the Snow White of Modernist Feminism but probably only the crumpets at The Guardian really believed that anyway.

Note:  they still do.  They learn even more slowly than the DCCC.


The resentment steadily grows regarding claims of Russian interference in the election and the surest sign of that is when even CNN finally sees through it or at least one of them.  (CNN:  'A Better Deal' is more of the same from Dems)

When you see Democrats going Bolshevik on the Romanovs running the Centrists, you will know why and probably won't be much surprised.

Ed:  you're going to whack the Centrists?

Negatory on that and there's no need when they're throwing themselves out of windows this way.  We just need some butterfly nets to catch their wallets when they fall.

Ed:  you just become Centrists if you do it for the money!

Sure but we won't keep it and will instead give it to poor people.  If the fall doesn't kill those bastards, the rage at where the money went will do it for sure.

No comments: