It's impressive when you head for the Atomic Bomb article and maybe you kick right back out of it since this isn't the basic survey course but still there was interest to look. There's a perennial crew of boob monkeys coming through which I find kind of amusing since, sure, there are boobs here and there but nothing even close to lad's mag material. Son, if'n you're coming here for porno then, I'm tellin' you, your pizza done lost its pepperonis.
That article spews some hard-core American history and every word of it is documented. All of is contrary to that which is called history now but some of you saw that for yourself in the article or your own reading of the history. Much of that which they're pitching now simply isn't true. (Ithaka: Atomic Bomb, Japan, and Racial Guilt #History)
It's impressive that y'all even show interest in such a subject but I wouldn't be gettin' too puffed up just yet since the invisible woman in London is pulling more reads and I suppose she must be naked but prurience factor is like a date with Theresa May or anyone in Connecticut (cough).
Ithaka: See the Invisible Woman in London
The Anthropologist inevitably asks, are those the same people. Does this mean people who get off on understanding the early evolution of nuclear weaponry in America also have interest in invisible women, probably naked, in London. Inquiring minds need to know.
Inquiring Mind: no, we don't.
Fair enough, mate.
However, we observe this must mean they're mostly PIs rather than CIs.
Inquiring Mind: what about the porno monkeys?
We don't know about them except they don't seem to be able to get laid.
In an RL example, we have one who has always had an implicit understanding of his standing with things whereas in my own case, I never did. That seems clear evidence of the PI (i.e. Practical Intelligence) approach to things but the same fellow had previously announced, in total seriousness, "I want to cure death."
No doubt that's CIspeak (i.e. Creative Intelligence).
The PI won because that aspect knew he just wanted to get out of that house and he was out not too much later. Porno was probably of not much interest since he was married a few years after that.
Now the slam bang, screwin' like bonobo apes only lasts a couple of years in a marriage but Chinese have a marvelous story about that.
Confucius or somebody or other said, "Tie a knot in a string for each time you make love in a night and then untie a knot each time you make love the next night. Continue this through your marriage and eventually that string will have a lotta fuckin' knots."
Inquiring Mind: Confucius said that?
Oh sure
The PI understands such things and the RL example is married to the same woman, oh, at least three decades later.
That article spews some hard-core American history and every word of it is documented. All of is contrary to that which is called history now but some of you saw that for yourself in the article or your own reading of the history. Much of that which they're pitching now simply isn't true. (Ithaka: Atomic Bomb, Japan, and Racial Guilt #History)
It's impressive that y'all even show interest in such a subject but I wouldn't be gettin' too puffed up just yet since the invisible woman in London is pulling more reads and I suppose she must be naked but prurience factor is like a date with Theresa May or anyone in Connecticut (cough).
Ithaka: See the Invisible Woman in London
The Anthropologist inevitably asks, are those the same people. Does this mean people who get off on understanding the early evolution of nuclear weaponry in America also have interest in invisible women, probably naked, in London. Inquiring minds need to know.
Inquiring Mind: no, we don't.
Fair enough, mate.
However, we observe this must mean they're mostly PIs rather than CIs.
Inquiring Mind: what about the porno monkeys?
We don't know about them except they don't seem to be able to get laid.
In an RL example, we have one who has always had an implicit understanding of his standing with things whereas in my own case, I never did. That seems clear evidence of the PI (i.e. Practical Intelligence) approach to things but the same fellow had previously announced, in total seriousness, "I want to cure death."
No doubt that's CIspeak (i.e. Creative Intelligence).
The PI won because that aspect knew he just wanted to get out of that house and he was out not too much later. Porno was probably of not much interest since he was married a few years after that.
Now the slam bang, screwin' like bonobo apes only lasts a couple of years in a marriage but Chinese have a marvelous story about that.
Confucius or somebody or other said, "Tie a knot in a string for each time you make love in a night and then untie a knot each time you make love the next night. Continue this through your marriage and eventually that string will have a lotta fuckin' knots."
Inquiring Mind: Confucius said that?
Oh sure
The PI understands such things and the RL example is married to the same woman, oh, at least three decades later.
No comments:
Post a Comment