No-one with any association with Washington is more of a failure than Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Bernie Sanders summarized it succinctly:
Senator Sanders (I-Vermont) told MSNBC on Wednesday that the Democratic Party “in terms of how it does business, has failed.”
“I mean, the evidence is obvious,” he said. “It’s not just that we’ve lost the White House and the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House. We’ve lost 900 legislative seats in the last 8 or 9 years.”
- RT: ‘Already a grassroots party’: Former DNC chair irks Democrats with response to Sanders
For the soap opera, maybe Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the evil Erica Kane except she's not as smart and not as beautiful. She still sleazes about trying to torpedo Bernie Sanders in much the same way as Donald Trump has been trying to trash Paul Ryan.
We're watching the fucking second string, mates.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been the fifth column in the Democratic Party and the proof of her disloyalty came when she voted with Republicans against Elizabeth Warren when Warren tried to introduce legislation to regulate the abuses by check cashing stores.
Just because Wasserman Schultz says she's in favor of abortion rights doesn't make her a Democrat after Tomi Lahren did more or less the same thing and couldn't understand why Republicans spanked her. That shallow tart is made of exactly the same simple-minded and malicious vapor as Wasserman Schultz.
How Wasserman Schultz can muster enough unmitigated gall to show her face publicly anywhere after the way the Democratic Party disintegrated is astonishing. In the last few days, the DNC decided it wasn't sufficient to fire Wasserman Schultz but they also eighty-sixed everyone else who was working as part of the Clinton disaster.
It's not a surprise that Wasserman Schultz still holds office since she comes from Florida and they sent Marco Rubio as well. That should be sufficient proof Floridians don't expect much.
Ed: Florida gave us George Bush and they should be bombed!
Aww, gee, that's a weeper, isn't it. Let's get all nostalgic and listen to some Perry Como songs.
Ed: have you ever heard one?
Unknown but certainly not willingly. I'm not going to search YouTube; I don't want to know. If he was cool then my ol' Mother would have listened but she only loved Dino.
Ed: everybody loves Dino!
So she was way ahead of her time then wasn't she (larfs).
That's called up the stoner segue to a five-point toss-up for the sibs as to whether our ol' Mother was a feminist. I do and ... here's why.
Ed: gee, how did I know you would tell us why?
I asked her in her nineties what she loved about our ol' Dad and she said it was that he would do anything for her. That does not tell me she felt like a slave.
Our ol' Dad didn't do anything. He would have been helpless to find a damn spoon to stir his tea. That was Forties / Fifties man stuff in making the dollars to make it happen but there's not much after that. It won't be me saying they didn't know man stuff since that lot won WWII and we haven't won, well, anything.
That aspect of things looks sexist as hell but it doesn't appear to me they saw it that way. It looks to me like both saw themselves as warriors doing everything in their capability to do to make a family work. What's more feminist than that?
Ed: families aren't about feminism!
Bullshit. Without families, feminism wouldn't mean anything and a woman would be just one more joker on the street hustling for a job.
Ed: in a perfect world, wouldn't that be true?
Sure ... but it ain't perfect and it ain't true. Women are suspect in the workplace since maybe we pay the big bucks to get her trained but we don't get a payoff from that before she drops out to make babies. That's busting women all the time so families have an immense effect on feminism or the perception of it.
Ed: and any woman who does not make babies is a grasping, frigid bitch?
Roger that, mate. It's a shitty deal and it's not even close to fixed.
Ed: are you going to loop back to Wasserman Schultz?
Nah, you already know she won't fix it; she didn't even support the increased minimum wage. She ain't one of us and never was.
Senator Sanders (I-Vermont) told MSNBC on Wednesday that the Democratic Party “in terms of how it does business, has failed.”
“I mean, the evidence is obvious,” he said. “It’s not just that we’ve lost the White House and the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House. We’ve lost 900 legislative seats in the last 8 or 9 years.”
- RT: ‘Already a grassroots party’: Former DNC chair irks Democrats with response to Sanders
For the soap opera, maybe Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the evil Erica Kane except she's not as smart and not as beautiful. She still sleazes about trying to torpedo Bernie Sanders in much the same way as Donald Trump has been trying to trash Paul Ryan.
We're watching the fucking second string, mates.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been the fifth column in the Democratic Party and the proof of her disloyalty came when she voted with Republicans against Elizabeth Warren when Warren tried to introduce legislation to regulate the abuses by check cashing stores.
Just because Wasserman Schultz says she's in favor of abortion rights doesn't make her a Democrat after Tomi Lahren did more or less the same thing and couldn't understand why Republicans spanked her. That shallow tart is made of exactly the same simple-minded and malicious vapor as Wasserman Schultz.
How Wasserman Schultz can muster enough unmitigated gall to show her face publicly anywhere after the way the Democratic Party disintegrated is astonishing. In the last few days, the DNC decided it wasn't sufficient to fire Wasserman Schultz but they also eighty-sixed everyone else who was working as part of the Clinton disaster.
It's not a surprise that Wasserman Schultz still holds office since she comes from Florida and they sent Marco Rubio as well. That should be sufficient proof Floridians don't expect much.
Ed: Florida gave us George Bush and they should be bombed!
Aww, gee, that's a weeper, isn't it. Let's get all nostalgic and listen to some Perry Como songs.
Ed: have you ever heard one?
Unknown but certainly not willingly. I'm not going to search YouTube; I don't want to know. If he was cool then my ol' Mother would have listened but she only loved Dino.
Ed: everybody loves Dino!
So she was way ahead of her time then wasn't she (larfs).
That's called up the stoner segue to a five-point toss-up for the sibs as to whether our ol' Mother was a feminist. I do and ... here's why.
Ed: gee, how did I know you would tell us why?
I asked her in her nineties what she loved about our ol' Dad and she said it was that he would do anything for her. That does not tell me she felt like a slave.
Our ol' Dad didn't do anything. He would have been helpless to find a damn spoon to stir his tea. That was Forties / Fifties man stuff in making the dollars to make it happen but there's not much after that. It won't be me saying they didn't know man stuff since that lot won WWII and we haven't won, well, anything.
That aspect of things looks sexist as hell but it doesn't appear to me they saw it that way. It looks to me like both saw themselves as warriors doing everything in their capability to do to make a family work. What's more feminist than that?
Ed: families aren't about feminism!
Bullshit. Without families, feminism wouldn't mean anything and a woman would be just one more joker on the street hustling for a job.
Ed: in a perfect world, wouldn't that be true?
Sure ... but it ain't perfect and it ain't true. Women are suspect in the workplace since maybe we pay the big bucks to get her trained but we don't get a payoff from that before she drops out to make babies. That's busting women all the time so families have an immense effect on feminism or the perception of it.
Ed: and any woman who does not make babies is a grasping, frigid bitch?
Roger that, mate. It's a shitty deal and it's not even close to fixed.
Ed: are you going to loop back to Wasserman Schultz?
Nah, you already know she won't fix it; she didn't even support the increased minimum wage. She ain't one of us and never was.
No comments:
Post a Comment