You already know politicians are not interesting or you would not be reading this but maybe you're curious how some multi-ton bloodthirsty reptile can be interesting at all beyond methods of avoidance.
The research sources for this ponderous question were Jurassic Park I and II. The first presents as the marvel you remember and it shows people in reverence of these magnificent creatures.
Note: image heavily cropped
Through the setup section, the respect and near-reverence for living dinosaurs is repeated multiple times and the portrayal of them is spectacularly beautiful. That sets us up for the crash bang when the beasties go berserk but the setup section is almost idyllic.
Given we see no politicians who enjoy any type of reverence, we submit dinosaurs take the easy win in this round.
Only one guy in the first Jurassic Park is a corrupt, money-grubbing pig and he's highly-destructive but all of the others are highly-idealistic. The vibe is almost universal in the setup of, gee whiz, isn't science wonderful. That it all goes crash bang at the end is as more the consequence of unconstrained science than the avarice of the bad guy and it ends with a smile when the good guys get out alive.
Favorite lines:
Hunter: I think this is Gennaro over here.
Laura Dern: There's part of him over here too.
Holy mackerel. Even "Braveheart" can't give you gore like that.
We don't see any idealistic politicians or none who last long but idealism likely isn't in the dino ethos so no score on that. However, for gore and blowing people to bits, we see a tie between dinos and humans so both get a point and that brings the score to 2:1 in favor of the dinos.
There was a remarkable piece of science used to explain how the dinos were able to create fertile eggs since the base DNA came from frogs and some have the ability to change sex during the frog's lifetime. This also explains how the Sandersaurus developed as a vegetarian leaf-browsing dinosaur but changed during its lifetime to become one of the carniverous dinosaurs.
In this transformational regard, dinos and humans are dead even and each score one point which brings the total score to 3:2 in favor of the dinos since they can flip flop just as fast as a Washington politician.
While almost everyone in the first movie was an innocent, almost all of those in the second movie were greedy, evil pigdogs. The question was whether Julianne Moore could save it but she had no chance since the movie hammered hard on humans are avaricious pigdogs who will cause huge problems and probably get killed by them but many innocent people will be killed as well. It's heavy-handed like a Star Trek morality play with William Shatner reading the Bible in Klingon or, well, William Shatner doing anything.
Even Steven Spielberg has to release a goat once in a while and he got many goat credits for this rubbishy piece of crap. People are bad ... really, really bad, especially if they have dinosaurs. wtf??
Almost all of the reverence for the dinos was gone in the second one and that was one of the biggest charms of the first one.
We still have the dino reverence and politicians are still unchanged so dinos take the game as more interesting than the pols.
The research sources for this ponderous question were Jurassic Park I and II. The first presents as the marvel you remember and it shows people in reverence of these magnificent creatures.
Note: image heavily cropped
Through the setup section, the respect and near-reverence for living dinosaurs is repeated multiple times and the portrayal of them is spectacularly beautiful. That sets us up for the crash bang when the beasties go berserk but the setup section is almost idyllic.
Given we see no politicians who enjoy any type of reverence, we submit dinosaurs take the easy win in this round.
Only one guy in the first Jurassic Park is a corrupt, money-grubbing pig and he's highly-destructive but all of the others are highly-idealistic. The vibe is almost universal in the setup of, gee whiz, isn't science wonderful. That it all goes crash bang at the end is as more the consequence of unconstrained science than the avarice of the bad guy and it ends with a smile when the good guys get out alive.
Favorite lines:
Hunter: I think this is Gennaro over here.
Laura Dern: There's part of him over here too.
Holy mackerel. Even "Braveheart" can't give you gore like that.
We don't see any idealistic politicians or none who last long but idealism likely isn't in the dino ethos so no score on that. However, for gore and blowing people to bits, we see a tie between dinos and humans so both get a point and that brings the score to 2:1 in favor of the dinos.
There was a remarkable piece of science used to explain how the dinos were able to create fertile eggs since the base DNA came from frogs and some have the ability to change sex during the frog's lifetime. This also explains how the Sandersaurus developed as a vegetarian leaf-browsing dinosaur but changed during its lifetime to become one of the carniverous dinosaurs.
In this transformational regard, dinos and humans are dead even and each score one point which brings the total score to 3:2 in favor of the dinos since they can flip flop just as fast as a Washington politician.
While almost everyone in the first movie was an innocent, almost all of those in the second movie were greedy, evil pigdogs. The question was whether Julianne Moore could save it but she had no chance since the movie hammered hard on humans are avaricious pigdogs who will cause huge problems and probably get killed by them but many innocent people will be killed as well. It's heavy-handed like a Star Trek morality play with William Shatner reading the Bible in Klingon or, well, William Shatner doing anything.
Even Steven Spielberg has to release a goat once in a while and he got many goat credits for this rubbishy piece of crap. People are bad ... really, really bad, especially if they have dinosaurs. wtf??
Almost all of the reverence for the dinos was gone in the second one and that was one of the biggest charms of the first one.
We still have the dino reverence and politicians are still unchanged so dinos take the game as more interesting than the pols.
No comments:
Post a Comment