Jerry Sandusky has a son who has proudly revealed himself as being as much of a pervert toward children as old dad and now he's been arrested for it. (RT: Jerry Sandusky's son arrested, charged with child molestation)
It gets better since Sandusky's son is adopted so genetics had nothing to do with it. In other words, Sandusky's son learned it some other way and what do you suppose that was, li'l duckie?
The Rockhouse has been clear on this for years and there is zero tolerance. If an adult abuses a kid in any way whatsoever, that adult will never get back out of jail.
Ed: oh great, then the perv might as well kill the kid since it will make no difference to the punishment.
When the alternative is to do nothing while those perverts repeatedly commit the same crimes, that argument doesn't impress me, especially since they're the ones most likely to kill children anyway.
Herewith, the first of three of the Rockhouse Hare-Brained Theories:
Jerry Sandusky is just one more pervert in a world which is suddenly crawling with those despicable people and the bigger question is why are they everywhere now when they were not before.
Ed: priests in the Catholic Church have been molesting children probably for centuries!
True enough but I'm not willing to blame the closed society of the priests for spreading that twisted thinking among the laity. A recent survey in Australia showed about fifteen percent of the priests had abused children and knock yourself out if you want to review the peccadillos of perv priests but that topic has been flogged and it's only partially the point anyway.
The question is why there's so much more sexual abuse of children now when there was not previously. Good luck on blaming that on Catholic priests but they don't advertise whereas the Internet does little else now.
Ed: you're blaming the increases in child sex abuse on the Internet?
Dead center.
When they bust someone for collecting child pornography, we often hear of them having thousands of pictures of children being abused. Where did they get them, ducks? Where did they even hear about them?
America is where they bitched about commercials on television so they created the Internet and now the commercials never stop, especially the ones for pederastic pedophiles, it seems.
Ed: you're not even going to try to defend your bullshit theory?
You know already it's true. What's to justify?
People believe whatever they like and if that ain't true then how come the eighty-five percent of Catholic priests who never think of doing shitty things to children get no respect for that.
Meanwhile, people giggle when the hot teacher brings a young lad to the ways of love or at least screwing in classrooms. Some have said that was happening when I went to school and I (sob) just didn't know about it but I see teachers getting busted for that on a continuous basis in the news. Even more unusual is it seems maybe teachers who do such things would not be good-looking but that's often not true so why do they do it.
Since we love you from here at the Rockhouse, here is tonight's second Hare-Brained Theory.
The teachers are socially-isolated. They're quite young as in twenties and they do their teaching in classrooms during the day and maybe knock off at five o'clock. Maybe there is an hour or two getting back to the apartment, making a meal, etc. After that, teach needs, at a minimum, to come up with some kind of lesson plan for the next day. The homework begins and the evening starts marching along.
Maybe during the first week or two she's thinking, you know, I'll get out to the streets this weekend. Yep, that's what I'll do. By the end of the quarter or semester, she's probably not going anywhere and she's deep in the environment of the children having far more contact with them than anyone else.
Now y'all are raising some large-size chill'uns these days. I remember some large individuals in school but not all that many but they often look like giants today. When I'm a cute li'l 5'4" 22-year-old teacher trying to counsel a 6'2" kid who is already built up like a football player, my ability to differentiate men from boys may blur.
We have seen frequently with these teachers that they're not looking for some cheap thrills and they would marry their chosen boys if the state allowed it. From that we observe the barriers are completely gone.
So there's Rockhouse Hare-Brained Theory #555-214-c: relationships between female teachers and young boys comes about from social isolation of teachers.
Ed: you just make excuses for them!
Perhaps but pony up a better explanation and let's hear it.
One more Hare-Brained Theory since the Silas is on a roll and this one is regarding something Cadillac Man and I reviewed a bit with the way people only see what they want to believe.
For this one, I offer the Theory of Internosis or hypnosis by the Internet, specifically in the form of social networks. The basic physics of social networks is the magnetism of similar beliefs so each person becomes the hub in a center of agreement. That center inevitably repels anything which contradicts its agreement and its strength to do that grows with each new Like or Friend event. The hypnotic aspect is the person at the hub who created the center is equally drawn by his or her own artificial creation since that level of agreement doesn't come anywhere else.
Ed: fucking social network physics! I don't believe I'm seeing this crap!
Like I say, pony up a better answer and the board is yours, mate.
If the above ain't true then why are people spending hours at a time in social networks and they feel so compelled to keep track of them they're carrying expensive devices at all times but they have no more future than a landfill; every cellphone dies in two years and many in only one due to planned obsolescence. People thought they were so clever in pushing away from the planned obsolescence inherent in automobiles ... so they got Apple to do it to them instead.
It gets better since Sandusky's son is adopted so genetics had nothing to do with it. In other words, Sandusky's son learned it some other way and what do you suppose that was, li'l duckie?
The Rockhouse has been clear on this for years and there is zero tolerance. If an adult abuses a kid in any way whatsoever, that adult will never get back out of jail.
Ed: oh great, then the perv might as well kill the kid since it will make no difference to the punishment.
When the alternative is to do nothing while those perverts repeatedly commit the same crimes, that argument doesn't impress me, especially since they're the ones most likely to kill children anyway.
Herewith, the first of three of the Rockhouse Hare-Brained Theories:
Jerry Sandusky is just one more pervert in a world which is suddenly crawling with those despicable people and the bigger question is why are they everywhere now when they were not before.
Ed: priests in the Catholic Church have been molesting children probably for centuries!
True enough but I'm not willing to blame the closed society of the priests for spreading that twisted thinking among the laity. A recent survey in Australia showed about fifteen percent of the priests had abused children and knock yourself out if you want to review the peccadillos of perv priests but that topic has been flogged and it's only partially the point anyway.
The question is why there's so much more sexual abuse of children now when there was not previously. Good luck on blaming that on Catholic priests but they don't advertise whereas the Internet does little else now.
Ed: you're blaming the increases in child sex abuse on the Internet?
Dead center.
When they bust someone for collecting child pornography, we often hear of them having thousands of pictures of children being abused. Where did they get them, ducks? Where did they even hear about them?
America is where they bitched about commercials on television so they created the Internet and now the commercials never stop, especially the ones for pederastic pedophiles, it seems.
Ed: you're not even going to try to defend your bullshit theory?
You know already it's true. What's to justify?
People believe whatever they like and if that ain't true then how come the eighty-five percent of Catholic priests who never think of doing shitty things to children get no respect for that.
Meanwhile, people giggle when the hot teacher brings a young lad to the ways of love or at least screwing in classrooms. Some have said that was happening when I went to school and I (sob) just didn't know about it but I see teachers getting busted for that on a continuous basis in the news. Even more unusual is it seems maybe teachers who do such things would not be good-looking but that's often not true so why do they do it.
Since we love you from here at the Rockhouse, here is tonight's second Hare-Brained Theory.
The teachers are socially-isolated. They're quite young as in twenties and they do their teaching in classrooms during the day and maybe knock off at five o'clock. Maybe there is an hour or two getting back to the apartment, making a meal, etc. After that, teach needs, at a minimum, to come up with some kind of lesson plan for the next day. The homework begins and the evening starts marching along.
Maybe during the first week or two she's thinking, you know, I'll get out to the streets this weekend. Yep, that's what I'll do. By the end of the quarter or semester, she's probably not going anywhere and she's deep in the environment of the children having far more contact with them than anyone else.
Now y'all are raising some large-size chill'uns these days. I remember some large individuals in school but not all that many but they often look like giants today. When I'm a cute li'l 5'4" 22-year-old teacher trying to counsel a 6'2" kid who is already built up like a football player, my ability to differentiate men from boys may blur.
We have seen frequently with these teachers that they're not looking for some cheap thrills and they would marry their chosen boys if the state allowed it. From that we observe the barriers are completely gone.
So there's Rockhouse Hare-Brained Theory #555-214-c: relationships between female teachers and young boys comes about from social isolation of teachers.
Ed: you just make excuses for them!
Perhaps but pony up a better explanation and let's hear it.
One more Hare-Brained Theory since the Silas is on a roll and this one is regarding something Cadillac Man and I reviewed a bit with the way people only see what they want to believe.
For this one, I offer the Theory of Internosis or hypnosis by the Internet, specifically in the form of social networks. The basic physics of social networks is the magnetism of similar beliefs so each person becomes the hub in a center of agreement. That center inevitably repels anything which contradicts its agreement and its strength to do that grows with each new Like or Friend event. The hypnotic aspect is the person at the hub who created the center is equally drawn by his or her own artificial creation since that level of agreement doesn't come anywhere else.
Ed: fucking social network physics! I don't believe I'm seeing this crap!
Like I say, pony up a better answer and the board is yours, mate.
If the above ain't true then why are people spending hours at a time in social networks and they feel so compelled to keep track of them they're carrying expensive devices at all times but they have no more future than a landfill; every cellphone dies in two years and many in only one due to planned obsolescence. People thought they were so clever in pushing away from the planned obsolescence inherent in automobiles ... so they got Apple to do it to them instead.
10 comments:
Is the same theory true for male teachers.
I agree blame the internet but not for the cause. But for increase in knowledge of the events. 30 years ago Ms Sharp seducing or being seduced by a 16yearold only made local news. Now it makes Utube and a couple million hits.
Same as pedophilia, always been there but today a few clicks lists every pedophile within a given radius and allows you to track them via the legal system.
Not to mention all of this makes great copy for news anchors
PS my family phones are all over two years old at least one is 5
Never understood the latest greatest craze. When I have to replace a tired horse I do replace it with a stallion though
I also dont understand the Internosis. I dont understand the allure of social media. Or why people allow complete strangers to own them emotionally because of some ridiculous comment they made on a FB page. Or the need to always have the last word on said page.
Cadillac Man Theory of Societal Hypnosis #10000001. Instinct is normal, ubiquitous and necessary for survival. Societal mores define lascivious behavior. But alas, anything man-made such as mores is temporal and must be enforced. For example, the Old Testament in Leviticus 20:10 places the penalty of death on adultery. Since a recent study of Americans showed 57% of men and 54% of women have committed adultery, it appears instinct rules. China developed a one child policy in 1980 to control its population. It apparently worked too well, as it is now being phased out in lieu of a two child policy. The Victorian Era was also known for similar attempts to control population. In both cases enforcement was sporatic. Interfamily marriage has been banned because of spread of genetic disease long, long before the existence of genes and DNA were known. In this case, most societies provide strict penalties and compliance is high. In the case of a female teacher having sexual relationships with a young tyro, there is growing recognition of such behavior that previously was largely ignored. Therefore, controls over instinct are vicarious and visceral to the needs and common sense (or lack thereof) of society. Penalties for disobeyance are likewise equivalent to their success. The fact that sex is instinctual and hard-wired for our survival remains the Cadillac Man Theory of Societal Hypnosis #10000001. UH!
Cadillac Man, you don't seem to buy it that there are more female teachers boffing their charges today relative to earlier times although I did notice you managed to work 'tyro' into it. Congrats on that and lots of excellent examples as well.
Lotho, you don't seem to buy the idea of an increase either. I heard from Pink when something along this line came up previously that there was a teacher back at my school but I just didn't know about it. Even so, the stories are so common now that they don't even make the front page anymore.
The reason I'm believing that is I'm hearing a whole lot less of male students being molested by male teachers than I did at one time while I'm hearing more about male students getting into unusual relationships with female teachers. I don't consider the latter molestation due to the differences in sexuality between men and women as legal equality is good but we're still not the same any other way.
I have no idea how rare you may be in resistance to upgrade, upgrade, upgrade. In my own life, I upgraded a lot with computers but that was required by the job / career plans. Other things I didn't upgrade at all so I'm a mixed bag for planned obsolescence. Part of the reason I chucked my iPhone was I had a cheap cellphone in Greece but it didn't work worth a damn and an iPhone is just as much subject to dead zones so I just never went back to it. That one was a release or two behind Apple when I dumped it.
With the sibs and social networks, Tinkerbell uses Facebook quite a lot; Queen Bee uses it or not as she likes; Doc seems to post and bail out after for other things. The social networks are just like the old computer bulletin boards until they start chatting and that's where the artificial world grows in surrounding yourself with Agree-ers. I'm getting progressively more convinced social networks are one of the worst forces in the world right now but that needs its own article.
Planned obsolescence is just a marketing ploy. I use the batteries of cell phones as an example. Phones work great but the batteries are now not replaceable but have a finite charge/discharge cycle.
All my offspring use FB etc as the main source of communication. As it is far more convenient to look at information at their time and pace.
Verbal communication to them is only done face to face. Phones are just used to access Internet.
How is any teacher student relationship deemed okay. I would go after any teacher that seduced my child male or female.
I don't think any relationship between an adult and a child is acceptable although I'm a lot less critical of female teachers doing it with boys due to my perception the damage is less than when males seduce / rape male or female kids. That goes into the general fantasy of "The Graduate" in some ways and that didn't exactly work out so well, tho.
The Graduate is a bad example as he is an adult. So if perception was reality then the boy is only a little damaged so that is okay. I think your logic is a bit warped on this subject.
So when the boy becomes a man and age differences lines become very blurred then molests a 14 year old girl is the damage still less critical
I really have no idea how damaged he may be but he's in deep weeds if he falls in love with her which he probably will.
The age blurring you mention is the problem to solve and that goes back to these teachers being functionally cloistered by their jobs and the Rockhouse Hare-Brained Theory is that's when the ages blur due to spending so much time with only this group of people.
It is only age blurring to those involved. It is quite clear to an outsider.
Rockhouse Hare-Brained Theory is quite aptly titled.
You can't justify the adults actions from either sex. Adults don't play with kids. Seems very simple.
No need here to argue the point since I have no particularly good defense. My interest is because there's some really unusual psychology / sociology behind it and I don't believe it was so common when I was a kid.
Post a Comment