The first part of the immolation of Billy Bob's is you can't smoke there anymore. No more smokin' at Billy Bob's, the No. 1 cowboy party bar for miles and miles around where every country act ever worth a damn has played but now only Florence Nightingale is an appropriate customer ... so long as she's still a virgin, we suppose.
The pleasure of the inspection for Billy Bob's was not mine since this was Yevette's indulgence in the company of some friends.
(Ed: you did not go because you have no friends?)
It's the story of me sad life (sob).
Yevette does not like giving her ID to anyone because she doesn't trust the state and, in a time of legalized cop / state theft via civil forfeiture, why would anyone trust the state; there's simply not a basis for it and the state gives no indication it cares whether it's trusted anyway.
ID was requested from Yevette before they would admit her to the place but she questioned the necessity by asking, "Can't you tell I'm over twenty-one just by looking?"
The potato on the door squeaked out, "Yes but we're required to check IDs to ensure they're authentic."
Yevette questioned this also and asked, "Why is it necessary to check anything when you can see for yourself I am legal?"
Potato simply shrugged helplessly in its charming spud-like way and whimpered, "I have to do it. This is my job."
Yevette did not say, 'why should I care about your job when the best one you could get was checking IDs at the door in a bar?' That would have elicited the inevitable whining about how the potato got replaced by a robot at his old job at Walmart.
The reason for Yevette's reticence was visual inspection of the ID as not sufficient and instead they used a machine but you don't even have to ask whether that machine was connected to the Internet. Sure as hell it sends notification to the State to advise, Yevette is at Billy Bob's.
(Ed: so what?)
Unless she is telling lies in a campaign speech, Yevette doesn't want the State to have the faintest idea where she is, what's she's doing, or why she is doing it. If the State wants to know anything of such matters, it should show the common courtesy and common decency of asking itself.
(Ed: what if she is telling lies in a campaign speech?)
That should automatically call in targeting for a drone strike on wherever she does it. Good night, Clinton (sob).
(Ed: what about Trump?)
Would not work because he does not know when he's lying.
The pleasure of the inspection for Billy Bob's was not mine since this was Yevette's indulgence in the company of some friends.
(Ed: you did not go because you have no friends?)
It's the story of me sad life (sob).
Yevette does not like giving her ID to anyone because she doesn't trust the state and, in a time of legalized cop / state theft via civil forfeiture, why would anyone trust the state; there's simply not a basis for it and the state gives no indication it cares whether it's trusted anyway.
ID was requested from Yevette before they would admit her to the place but she questioned the necessity by asking, "Can't you tell I'm over twenty-one just by looking?"
The potato on the door squeaked out, "Yes but we're required to check IDs to ensure they're authentic."
Yevette questioned this also and asked, "Why is it necessary to check anything when you can see for yourself I am legal?"
Potato simply shrugged helplessly in its charming spud-like way and whimpered, "I have to do it. This is my job."
Yevette did not say, 'why should I care about your job when the best one you could get was checking IDs at the door in a bar?' That would have elicited the inevitable whining about how the potato got replaced by a robot at his old job at Walmart.
The reason for Yevette's reticence was visual inspection of the ID as not sufficient and instead they used a machine but you don't even have to ask whether that machine was connected to the Internet. Sure as hell it sends notification to the State to advise, Yevette is at Billy Bob's.
(Ed: so what?)
Unless she is telling lies in a campaign speech, Yevette doesn't want the State to have the faintest idea where she is, what's she's doing, or why she is doing it. If the State wants to know anything of such matters, it should show the common courtesy and common decency of asking itself.
(Ed: what if she is telling lies in a campaign speech?)
That should automatically call in targeting for a drone strike on wherever she does it. Good night, Clinton (sob).
(Ed: what about Trump?)
Would not work because he does not know when he's lying.
No comments:
Post a Comment