Thursday, May 12, 2016

Absolving Obama of Anything is Not Much Different from Demonizing Him for Everything

He's already a great man, he's the fookin' President!  He went from some guy in a political stew somewhere to a major figure in the history books.  We see no black or white in this but rather some guy who believes he knows what's right and is determined to work to make it happen.


Even great men make mistakes and so he has.  Failure to recognize them is, we believe, foolhardy and there doesn't seem much point when we vote for the man and his color is irrelevant.  We voted for Obama because, at the time, he was the best voice in the crowd and, we notice, he destroyed Clinton with honesty.  Amazing how that works, isn't it.


His administration met certain goals but did not meet others.  Historians can amuse themselves with review of such things for years but we don't believe the man is on the same scale as, say, FDR or Eisenhower.  It's difficult for anyone to reach such standards of accomplishment and we don't for a moment believe being black or white has anything to do with it.


Honesty means everything and color is something we researched on Amazon to discover what is the current cost of Testor's enamel paints for model cars, etc.  That's of interest because Yevette wants to paint Clinton for Prison in 2016.  Of course I will help with that.

By the way, there is no way you will get this paint off anything.  You could probably paint the Space Shuttle with it for all the vehicle needs to survive re-entry.


We believe Obama has been highly-honest but he may not have made such good deals with the thick as a brick Congress.  There is nothing more to say on that matter as we also believe your own research will reveal the truth of it.

Of course he's a great man but we question whether he was the best.  We will vote for a black man any time but we will never vote for anyone because of his or her color, his or her gender, etc, etc.


(Ed:  you would vote for Caitlyn Jenner?)

In fact we would but only after hearing what she has to say in a debate.  Frankly, we don't think she would get through the introduction to one without making a fool of herself because we have heard a smattering of her politics in the past.

No comments: