We're so damn tired of people (e.g. Richard Dawkins) going off on Bible-bashing as if it's some Holy Order ... while they sell books and make the big bucks.
Sasquatch gets amusement out of observing the tattoo on her butt will get Betty Boop sent to hell (Leviticus) and, in the same section, it says insects have four legs. This doesn't disprove the Bible as much as it shows men wrote it which still doesn't disprove anything in it.
It's logically impossible to wipe out religion simply by destroying Christianity because there are too many others, most obviously in the Torah and the Koran. Unless you burn them all a la the Texas book burners, you have accomplished nothing more than every other book burner in history. I'm not a Christian but would I would NEVER burn the Bible. My ol' Dad would rise from the grave (he's not in one) to burn my ass! That's not science! Stand down!
My ol' Dad made it clear from way, way back it's my decision to make and I honor him for it. Many of my sibs chose differently in multiple variations but the choice was always ours.
There's a bit of mindless baiting from the atheist cadre which has now reached the level of calling me a peter puffer after I asked if he had read "The Origins of Life on Earth" by Miller and Orgul.
(Ed: he didn't read it!)
Right.
The book goes into the facts and theory regarding the actual genesis of the first life on Earth. They go into deep detail on the biochemistry and explain that which is known and that which is not. Again, the scientist invites the student to study it further rather than, a la Believer Boy, tells me God does not exist.
Further information on evolution today was revealed today in which the time scale was found for when deep-sea seaweed evolved into multi-cellular organisms and, without that, the Earth would have remained a stinking swamp.
Dawkins added his bit regarding genetics and it was good science but hardly with the wide-ranging scope of Mendel, etc. Nevertheless, it was good science.
Now he bashes the Bible and makes the big bucks on his books. Who knows, maybe he sells t-shirts as well as he tours or did at one time like he's some hotshot rock star.
Usually past-prime scientists don't blow their corks like this and insist on making such fools of themselves publicly but it's always a choice to make.
As ever, atheism is too simplistic to explain much of anything. I will retain my perception the God thing lit the fire which drove the biochemistry or by whatever magical mechanism this transpired. Beyond that, whatever faith you choose is true and the only way to disprove any of it is by taking the same faith to the science which murders it. Dawkins said it, I believe it, that settles it. Um, where did you hear that before, li'l chipmunks, unless it was on a bumper sticker which substituted God for Dawkins.
What you make of my perception is your choice and you have seen a long history in which I don't tell you what to believe but I sure will dredge up some bizarre knowledge which is my pitiful effort toward the psychohistory described by Asimov in "Foundation."
Through the sum of knowledge is Truth and only be respecting it from everywhere will we ever have a chance of finding it. That specifically rejects people on soap boxes preaching to pigeons in the park. We don't need people to tell us anything but rather we need directions for our own studies.
Maybe y'all doubt my humility but it's fookin' real, mates. My specific focus of late has been toward as much fact as possible so you decide that which is real information and the What's Hot each day reveals your search which is an excellent thing insofar as it tells me anything else I write does not add to it. In many ways, I'm not telling but but rather asking. It's the only way one can ever find real knowledge.
Note: it goes past me in no way whatsoever considerations of chucking the ganja overboard and possible clarity which comes from it. As I said, I have no intention of staying that way but it's a real consideration and part of this.
You know it goes with me as it's Rasta forever for One Love! I believe in the Love and, really, what else is necessary.
Sasquatch gets amusement out of observing the tattoo on her butt will get Betty Boop sent to hell (Leviticus) and, in the same section, it says insects have four legs. This doesn't disprove the Bible as much as it shows men wrote it which still doesn't disprove anything in it.
It's logically impossible to wipe out religion simply by destroying Christianity because there are too many others, most obviously in the Torah and the Koran. Unless you burn them all a la the Texas book burners, you have accomplished nothing more than every other book burner in history. I'm not a Christian but would I would NEVER burn the Bible. My ol' Dad would rise from the grave (he's not in one) to burn my ass! That's not science! Stand down!
My ol' Dad made it clear from way, way back it's my decision to make and I honor him for it. Many of my sibs chose differently in multiple variations but the choice was always ours.
There's a bit of mindless baiting from the atheist cadre which has now reached the level of calling me a peter puffer after I asked if he had read "The Origins of Life on Earth" by Miller and Orgul.
(Ed: he didn't read it!)
Right.
The book goes into the facts and theory regarding the actual genesis of the first life on Earth. They go into deep detail on the biochemistry and explain that which is known and that which is not. Again, the scientist invites the student to study it further rather than, a la Believer Boy, tells me God does not exist.
Further information on evolution today was revealed today in which the time scale was found for when deep-sea seaweed evolved into multi-cellular organisms and, without that, the Earth would have remained a stinking swamp.
Dawkins added his bit regarding genetics and it was good science but hardly with the wide-ranging scope of Mendel, etc. Nevertheless, it was good science.
Now he bashes the Bible and makes the big bucks on his books. Who knows, maybe he sells t-shirts as well as he tours or did at one time like he's some hotshot rock star.
Usually past-prime scientists don't blow their corks like this and insist on making such fools of themselves publicly but it's always a choice to make.
As ever, atheism is too simplistic to explain much of anything. I will retain my perception the God thing lit the fire which drove the biochemistry or by whatever magical mechanism this transpired. Beyond that, whatever faith you choose is true and the only way to disprove any of it is by taking the same faith to the science which murders it. Dawkins said it, I believe it, that settles it. Um, where did you hear that before, li'l chipmunks, unless it was on a bumper sticker which substituted God for Dawkins.
What you make of my perception is your choice and you have seen a long history in which I don't tell you what to believe but I sure will dredge up some bizarre knowledge which is my pitiful effort toward the psychohistory described by Asimov in "Foundation."
Through the sum of knowledge is Truth and only be respecting it from everywhere will we ever have a chance of finding it. That specifically rejects people on soap boxes preaching to pigeons in the park. We don't need people to tell us anything but rather we need directions for our own studies.
Maybe y'all doubt my humility but it's fookin' real, mates. My specific focus of late has been toward as much fact as possible so you decide that which is real information and the What's Hot each day reveals your search which is an excellent thing insofar as it tells me anything else I write does not add to it. In many ways, I'm not telling but but rather asking. It's the only way one can ever find real knowledge.
Note: it goes past me in no way whatsoever considerations of chucking the ganja overboard and possible clarity which comes from it. As I said, I have no intention of staying that way but it's a real consideration and part of this.
You know it goes with me as it's Rasta forever for One Love! I believe in the Love and, really, what else is necessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment