Already there is screaming of blame the refugees and somewhere around Paris a refugee camp was reported to be burning yesterday. There is the supposition Angela Merkel must close Germany's borders but, here at the Rockhouse, we believe Germany's open borders are a large part of why Germany has not been attacked. (The Guardian: Paris attacks: European leaders link terror threats to immigration)
The overt anti-Muslim hostility in multiple countries has, in each case, resulted in violence but this has not happened in other countries because ISIS cannot penetrate the country or there is not an obvious reason to do it.
France has been taunting Muslims for quite some time with Marine le Pen leading the pack and the previous leader of her crew stepped down because of his Hitler pose, complete with the stupid mustache. That kind of simple-mindedness isn't sufficient to lead a Boy Scout troop, much less a country and a people.
Above all things, there must be reason and there is damn little of it in the news. I saw CNN a few times and stopped wasting my time with it. They can make their money on death but not from me. That kind of blatant commercialization of such tragedy is a disgrace to America.
Here in America, we have seen Pamela Gellar and her cowardly provocation of Muslims. She does it behind closed doors with armed guards but there is little to no difference between Gellar, Charlie Hebdo or Marine le Pen, all of whom show the same cowardice in open provocation ... from a safe distance. It's not safe anymore and le Pen and Charlie Hebdo are obvious reasons, in part, for why that's true.
Frankly, if ISIS comes, we will throw Pamela Gellar to them and suggest to them, do what you will; we don't want her either and are ashamed of her. The racism and the right-wing extremism are some of the worst characteristics of America but they do not represent America, not by a long, long shot. They represent Hitlerian fascism far more than they represent a free society. If ISIS wants to waste the NAZI parties in the U.S. who profess white power and Hitlerian sympathies then they can have them too as we don't need that disgrace in these borders or anywhere else in the world.
Of one thing we are absolutely sure, if there is no clear mission beyond killing Muslims, the mission will fail. There is no need to justify the statement as you can see it in any news release and we have been watching it in the Middle East for fifteen years. There is no word from anyone on what they hope to accomplish. The only tiny glimmer of reason I have heard thus far as in Putin trying to make a peace in Syria but that offer received nothing but scoffing.
As in the following article, if any response is warranted then it must be united as a world against a scourge or there is not one reason to do it and that approach will inevitably result in unpredictable retaliation.
As it stands, the approach to Iraq has been to play chess but act is if they are playing dominos and still expect it to work. As we have seen, it does not. The tactics of the generals are from a previous century and they failed in Vietnam, they are failing now.
The war games of the generals are something they obtained from computers and, as we've seen, the only way to ensure efficacy with computers in situations for which they are absolutely mission-critical is to use five computers in tandem and look for the majority result (i.e. the NASA method). Still it sometimes does not work as evidenced by the orbiter which did everything perfectly ... except locate Mars. America has been missing the target in Iraq for fifteen years as is likely true for any unilateral approach from which a fake coalition of stooges is no different (e.g. Bush, Blair, and miscellaneous minor cohorts or Obama and his voodoo fortune tellers in the Pentagon).
The overt anti-Muslim hostility in multiple countries has, in each case, resulted in violence but this has not happened in other countries because ISIS cannot penetrate the country or there is not an obvious reason to do it.
France has been taunting Muslims for quite some time with Marine le Pen leading the pack and the previous leader of her crew stepped down because of his Hitler pose, complete with the stupid mustache. That kind of simple-mindedness isn't sufficient to lead a Boy Scout troop, much less a country and a people.
Above all things, there must be reason and there is damn little of it in the news. I saw CNN a few times and stopped wasting my time with it. They can make their money on death but not from me. That kind of blatant commercialization of such tragedy is a disgrace to America.
Here in America, we have seen Pamela Gellar and her cowardly provocation of Muslims. She does it behind closed doors with armed guards but there is little to no difference between Gellar, Charlie Hebdo or Marine le Pen, all of whom show the same cowardice in open provocation ... from a safe distance. It's not safe anymore and le Pen and Charlie Hebdo are obvious reasons, in part, for why that's true.
Frankly, if ISIS comes, we will throw Pamela Gellar to them and suggest to them, do what you will; we don't want her either and are ashamed of her. The racism and the right-wing extremism are some of the worst characteristics of America but they do not represent America, not by a long, long shot. They represent Hitlerian fascism far more than they represent a free society. If ISIS wants to waste the NAZI parties in the U.S. who profess white power and Hitlerian sympathies then they can have them too as we don't need that disgrace in these borders or anywhere else in the world.
Of one thing we are absolutely sure, if there is no clear mission beyond killing Muslims, the mission will fail. There is no need to justify the statement as you can see it in any news release and we have been watching it in the Middle East for fifteen years. There is no word from anyone on what they hope to accomplish. The only tiny glimmer of reason I have heard thus far as in Putin trying to make a peace in Syria but that offer received nothing but scoffing.
As in the following article, if any response is warranted then it must be united as a world against a scourge or there is not one reason to do it and that approach will inevitably result in unpredictable retaliation.
As it stands, the approach to Iraq has been to play chess but act is if they are playing dominos and still expect it to work. As we have seen, it does not. The tactics of the generals are from a previous century and they failed in Vietnam, they are failing now.
The war games of the generals are something they obtained from computers and, as we've seen, the only way to ensure efficacy with computers in situations for which they are absolutely mission-critical is to use five computers in tandem and look for the majority result (i.e. the NASA method). Still it sometimes does not work as evidenced by the orbiter which did everything perfectly ... except locate Mars. America has been missing the target in Iraq for fifteen years as is likely true for any unilateral approach from which a fake coalition of stooges is no different (e.g. Bush, Blair, and miscellaneous minor cohorts or Obama and his voodoo fortune tellers in the Pentagon).
No comments:
Post a Comment