We're clear on the basics that the Pentagon takes fifty percent of the tax gold every year which amounts to about half a trillion annually. Trump in his infinite genius said that's not enough and he will give them another fifty billion.
The Pentagon has responded that Donald Trump is a unwashed churl who cannot meet their needs since the military must have a much higher increase than anything that piker has proposed. The national debt is not important to the Pentagon since they don't plan for anything to be left anyway.
NATO and the United States have “no defense” against land-based cruise missiles if Russia deploys them in any quantity, the chief of US Strategic Command told senators, arguing the US must respond to Russian threat “from the position of strength.”
Appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday to report on STRATCOM programs, Air Force General John E. Hyten argued for fully funding the modernization of the US “nuclear triad” lest the American atomic arsenal fall behind the weapons developed by Russia, China and North Korea.
Senators appeared particularly interested in Russian nuclear capability, which Hyten described as “a primary element of their overall national security strategy.”
“We have to meet strength with strength,” he told the committee, as one never wants to negotiate with potential adversary from a position of weakness.
The US “has only effectively dealt with Russia from the position of strength,” Hyten said.
- RT: US has ‘no defense’ against Russian cruise missiles – STRATCOM chief
There's more cliche from that wheezing old geezer than one might expect from a child's first essay in school.
In the background of this, you have seen the Pentagon escalating US engagement all around Russia and has been putting anti-missile batteries all over the place. The only strategic consequence from that has been destroying the potential for nuclear disarmament. (RT: Nuclear disarmament hindered by US position on missile defense – Russian envoy)
There's an active threat to the world alright but it's not Russia; the Pentagon is bringing it for no better reason than sheer bloody mindedness. They haven't had a plan since the first day in the Middle East except to kill people and they don't have any better plan now.
The Pentagon generals are afforded some type of reverence but it's a sham when many of their medals don't mean anything and are only area ribbons. I've checked out one general after the other and almost invariably the fruit salad on their uniforms is nothing but mush. They're not warriors but accountants and not very good ones.
There's a similar situation with Attorney General Sessions since you know the things he was saying about marijuana weren't true but he delivered them absolutely deadpan and you could even watch his little rat-like whiskers twitching.
Note: I can never remember his name since his thoughts are inconsequential and I only come up with The Rat when I try to recall who he is. H. Ross Perot also had the genetic blessing of looking like a rat; there must be a gene for it, I suppose.
Sessions is much like these Pentagon generals insofar as they will say anything whatsoever to get what they want. Sessions said, "Good people don't use marijuana."
Good people also don't waste civilians on contract so what's your trip, Jeffie. You're not impressing me.
Oh, by the way, good people don't start nuke wars either and you can see all over how 'the nuke option' is being added to the language to condition the sheep to believing it really is an option. Fuck with the language to fuck with the minds; works almost every time. It's classic Chomsky.
The Pentagon has responded that Donald Trump is a unwashed churl who cannot meet their needs since the military must have a much higher increase than anything that piker has proposed. The national debt is not important to the Pentagon since they don't plan for anything to be left anyway.
NATO and the United States have “no defense” against land-based cruise missiles if Russia deploys them in any quantity, the chief of US Strategic Command told senators, arguing the US must respond to Russian threat “from the position of strength.”
Appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday to report on STRATCOM programs, Air Force General John E. Hyten argued for fully funding the modernization of the US “nuclear triad” lest the American atomic arsenal fall behind the weapons developed by Russia, China and North Korea.
Senators appeared particularly interested in Russian nuclear capability, which Hyten described as “a primary element of their overall national security strategy.”
“We have to meet strength with strength,” he told the committee, as one never wants to negotiate with potential adversary from a position of weakness.
The US “has only effectively dealt with Russia from the position of strength,” Hyten said.
- RT: US has ‘no defense’ against Russian cruise missiles – STRATCOM chief
There's more cliche from that wheezing old geezer than one might expect from a child's first essay in school.
In the background of this, you have seen the Pentagon escalating US engagement all around Russia and has been putting anti-missile batteries all over the place. The only strategic consequence from that has been destroying the potential for nuclear disarmament. (RT: Nuclear disarmament hindered by US position on missile defense – Russian envoy)
There's an active threat to the world alright but it's not Russia; the Pentagon is bringing it for no better reason than sheer bloody mindedness. They haven't had a plan since the first day in the Middle East except to kill people and they don't have any better plan now.
The Pentagon generals are afforded some type of reverence but it's a sham when many of their medals don't mean anything and are only area ribbons. I've checked out one general after the other and almost invariably the fruit salad on their uniforms is nothing but mush. They're not warriors but accountants and not very good ones.
There's a similar situation with Attorney General Sessions since you know the things he was saying about marijuana weren't true but he delivered them absolutely deadpan and you could even watch his little rat-like whiskers twitching.
Note: I can never remember his name since his thoughts are inconsequential and I only come up with The Rat when I try to recall who he is. H. Ross Perot also had the genetic blessing of looking like a rat; there must be a gene for it, I suppose.
Sessions is much like these Pentagon generals insofar as they will say anything whatsoever to get what they want. Sessions said, "Good people don't use marijuana."
Good people also don't waste civilians on contract so what's your trip, Jeffie. You're not impressing me.
Oh, by the way, good people don't start nuke wars either and you can see all over how 'the nuke option' is being added to the language to condition the sheep to believing it really is an option. Fuck with the language to fuck with the minds; works almost every time. It's classic Chomsky.
No comments:
Post a Comment