"The Timelines of History" is the twenty-three-dollar splurge for the month and it's exactly the book I thought which provides a cross-reference around the world for whatever events were happening in any given year. Those events are divided into columns specific to politics, science, arts, etc.
Watson: it's the perfect book for reading while you use the toilet
If your tastes don't run toward "People" magazine then "The Timelines of History" would be a good choice since you can open it anywhere to find something which gets you going with some, hmmm, that's interesting.
Watson: do you do that?
Nah. I did as a kid but I saw some people murdered for it and decided this was a behavior I needed to lose.
The book offers the potential to be even more egregiously boring than I ever imagined or hoped.
Y'all are fickle, tho. Unknown if you know that. The science articles were getting people jazzed, man, and now they may get a reaction ... or not. I was surprised since there was some majorly bad ass cancer science research reported today and that has nothing to do with anything plaguing Yevette or I but rather it's a near-future cancer killer and it's extremely tight in the way it delivers the payload. (Ithaka: Some Major Cancer Killing without Using Nanobots - Science)
Again, that was nothing to do personally with the Rockhouse and anything with that kind of content will contain Midwest in the title.
That kind of science content was getting people seriously lit up during one period but it seems to run heavier toward how we're all fed-up with Washington throttlebottoms just now. You're not really fickle about sweet articles since those hardly ever get off the ground so it's a surprise when you like one. There are some I know specific people will like but, in general, these types of articles won't pull a crowd hoo-rah.
This isn't a complaint as the Anthropology is to observe.
The number of science articles has declined and that's because there are fewer just now which I see as jazzy enough for presentation. That cancer article applies to anyone since cancer stalks us all but some types of science are too distant to have an immediate application.
It may look like some of the content is deliberately intended to draw Russians but it's not true and it doesn't. Sometimes they come in enormous numbers but I have no idea why. The nearest clue I ever got was someone in Moscow looking at the article about Carol Kirkwood. From that I conclude they're looking for a beautiful blonde with large breasts who will talk dirty to them. How should I know as there's no apparent pattern to that either.
Ed: Russkis are fickle too?
It does seem so, mate. Everybody's fickle ... whoa, whoa, whoa.
So did you know the earliest oboe was invented in the year 50 B.C. and Caesar was assassinated six years later. History is all about cause and effect. Things could get weird from "The Timelines of History."
Note: it's more politically correct to use BME for Before Modern Era but I don't give a fuck about political correctness. Before Christ tells you precisely what I mean.
Watson: it's the perfect book for reading while you use the toilet
If your tastes don't run toward "People" magazine then "The Timelines of History" would be a good choice since you can open it anywhere to find something which gets you going with some, hmmm, that's interesting.
Watson: do you do that?
Nah. I did as a kid but I saw some people murdered for it and decided this was a behavior I needed to lose.
The book offers the potential to be even more egregiously boring than I ever imagined or hoped.
Y'all are fickle, tho. Unknown if you know that. The science articles were getting people jazzed, man, and now they may get a reaction ... or not. I was surprised since there was some majorly bad ass cancer science research reported today and that has nothing to do with anything plaguing Yevette or I but rather it's a near-future cancer killer and it's extremely tight in the way it delivers the payload. (Ithaka: Some Major Cancer Killing without Using Nanobots - Science)
Again, that was nothing to do personally with the Rockhouse and anything with that kind of content will contain Midwest in the title.
That kind of science content was getting people seriously lit up during one period but it seems to run heavier toward how we're all fed-up with Washington throttlebottoms just now. You're not really fickle about sweet articles since those hardly ever get off the ground so it's a surprise when you like one. There are some I know specific people will like but, in general, these types of articles won't pull a crowd hoo-rah.
This isn't a complaint as the Anthropology is to observe.
The number of science articles has declined and that's because there are fewer just now which I see as jazzy enough for presentation. That cancer article applies to anyone since cancer stalks us all but some types of science are too distant to have an immediate application.
It may look like some of the content is deliberately intended to draw Russians but it's not true and it doesn't. Sometimes they come in enormous numbers but I have no idea why. The nearest clue I ever got was someone in Moscow looking at the article about Carol Kirkwood. From that I conclude they're looking for a beautiful blonde with large breasts who will talk dirty to them. How should I know as there's no apparent pattern to that either.
Ed: Russkis are fickle too?
It does seem so, mate. Everybody's fickle ... whoa, whoa, whoa.
So did you know the earliest oboe was invented in the year 50 B.C. and Caesar was assassinated six years later. History is all about cause and effect. Things could get weird from "The Timelines of History."
Note: it's more politically correct to use BME for Before Modern Era but I don't give a fuck about political correctness. Before Christ tells you precisely what I mean.
No comments:
Post a Comment