In a June 2013 speech, just months after she left the State Department, Clinton said she wished the United States could intervene in Syria "covertly as is possible for Americans to intervene."
"We used to be much better at this than we are now. Now, you know, everybody can't help themselves," she said. "They have to go out and tell their friendly reporters and somebody else: Look what we're doing and I want credit for it, and all the rest of it."
"We used to be much better at this than we are now. Now, you know, everybody can't help themselves," she said. "They have to go out and tell their friendly reporters and somebody else: Look what we're doing and I want credit for it, and all the rest of it."
I will assume you're aware of Kissinger organizing the CIA's covert attack on Salvador Allende in Chile which led to the Pinochet Reign of Terror.
'We used to be??' Cripes, she might have spent a little bit more time on English in school but better "Dukes of Hazzard" than nothing.
It's one hell of a damn shame the only way we get transparency from Clinton is when WikiLeaks forces it and they remain one of the profound defenses of freedom in the world. As further evidence of the shocking shallowness of Clinton and all of Washington, she blames it on Russia, just as did Kissinger when he got Allende murdered. Fifty years later and they didn't even change the excuse. No wonder she never graduated past sophomoric expressions such as 'we used to be.'
Moreover, look at the deliberate objective of lying to the press by omission about any aspect of this, just as did Kissinger regarding Allende, only to be revealed years later, most likely due to the Freedom of Information Act, one of the greatest enemies of Washingtonian subterfuge of which, as you're already painfully aware, there is far too much already.
Consider further her thoughts were after leaving Obama so her frustration was she couldn't get Obama to do it. That he would not is a surprise all in itself, given his blind adherence to the doctrine of Manifest Destiny. Thus she confirms she is more dangerous than he and thinks she is clever with her Machiavellian horror. Trump may be a lunatic (i.e. he is) but is not apparently so deeply evil as Clinton in which everything she says privately belies every claim of integrity in America which has not already been destroyed by the Republican Party.
No comments:
Post a Comment