Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Maybe Jet Down the Ultra Vi a Bitty Bit

Ultra Violence didn't work out so well in "A Clockwork Orange" even though it never really stopped.

Still there are times to go all-out Aztec to chop out some hearts with stone axes:

- when mercs dig up Indian graves and the merciless pigs who send the mercs sit behind in comfort and safety

- when cops kill hundreds of times more Americans than ISIS but every red-blood with a minor mind and large steroidal muscles believes ISIS is under every storm drain

- when people I know are said to be all covered with MEDICARE and yet still can't afford to pay for prescriptions

All of these things summon the demons and demand the ultra violence ... but y'all don't want to see any ultra violence because, after all, what good does it do.

Fair enough.  What good does it do.  It deserves more thought but a change is unpredictable when the trigger is continuous bullshit on the news.  The counter is not continuous ultra violent rebuttal even though it can seem that way.

Note:  there's no way in Blogger to segregate or make folders or some such to treat different types of articles separately from each other.  Most software seems to be born stupid and stay stupid these days.  Strange thing after seeing how software evolved in the Dark Ages when computers were cool and sysfrogs were gods.

That all the content comes in a continuous stream is likely impossible to follow in any linear way.  Thinking is much more a carousel and many things I do are to speed it up or slow it down,  mostly toward speeding it up.

Note:  that does NOT apply to any type of illegal chemical stimulants of any kind.  Illegal doesn't bother me but stupid is a problem.  If you would boost your mind, using a drug to do it is a defining act of genius, right?


Something which is a strong interest but which does not penetrate the blog enough is the daily review of science articles in peer-reviewed publications.  These are the ultra brights pushing research into all manner of twisted dimensions.

Posting those may seem like striking a sciencer pose of, oh, let's do Starbucks and talk about physics and those zero reflection gravity waves in a negative ion flux and ...

(Ed:  what did that mean?)

Nothing whatsoever.

The reason for the references when I may understand a lot or only a little of the specifics of the science is the search for the gestalt, the thing unifying all things if you like a more cosmic view.  For example, I'm seeing diverse research from multiple labs toward developing highly-capable systems and devices for sophisticated medical diagnostics.  From this I deduce there's a wave of robo coming to medium-level medicine which could even displace professionals.  This is of specific interest because one of the bloods has taken up one form of diagnostics, possibly on a career basis.  The cue on that may well be to become a rep and sell the 'bots as you bet they won't be cheap.  If you already do that diagnostic task, you're probably in so long as you have a presentable smile and seem to bathe regularly.

While I'm not even close to current on specifics for robots, that's not important to understand the thing they're trying to accomplish and, more importantly, how does that relate to things others are trying to accomplish within that or a similar discipline.

It may be my best move in seriously trying to jet down the ultra vi and bring some up twisted new world thinking, all of which is based on immediate science from accredited scientists.  The armchair part is 'if now they can do this it means they can then do that.'

No comments: