Notice the assiduous dehumanization in the statement by Hillary Clinton in precisely the same manner as that used for ISIS or any other group the White House wants to exterminate.
(Ed: exterminate?)
Dehumanizing any people is the first step toward wiping them out. Slaves weren't people either.
(Ed: exterminate?)
Dehumanizing any people is the first step toward wiping them out. Slaves weren't people either.
Q. is that a $600 haircut?? If yes, get yer money back!
Yeah, and NABISCO in Chicago wants to thank Bill Clinton for NAFTA which Hillary Clinton also aggressively supported. Like Ford, NABISCO recently announced it is building a modern new factory in Mexico.
How Hillary Clinton finds the unmitigated gall to even enter the city of Chicago would be unfathomable except for the obvious thickness of the skin of either she or her reptilian husband.
Today I heard statements from multiple Bernie Sanders supporters who said if Hillary Clinton is the candidate then they will vote for Donald Trump. It's a shocking thing and it was hardly a landslide taking that position but it's one extraordinary thing when thinking people consider Trump less dangerous than Clinton.
In fact, I have a bit of agreement as I expect Trump will be largely ineffectual because he's 99% pussy and most of his enterprises have failed anyway. Conversely, Clinton is stupidly aggressive because she has something to prove and that could easily be a bigger threat than comes from an inept blowhard.
6 comments:
Most business people fail many times. But he didnt amass billions by always failing. Obviously he succeeded often enough
He wont succeed as a President as neither party supports any if his ideas
You are like Rush Limbaugh, If you are against someone they can have no positive attributes
I dont quite understand that It seems as though if you did it would lessen your case against them
G Gordon Liddy one of the few radio people who doesnt do that. Most will never admit the other side can do anything positive or have a positive attribute.
Until people can do that politics can never change.
The people that are so truculent in support of a candidate is a good thing. It shows that people are being moved by the political process. The end result of the primaries will be in a few months at the Democratic and Republican conventions. In order to unify the party behind a candidate there will need to be a lot of concessions in the platforms of both parties. No candidate can win without the full support of their behind them. An example of this is the election of 1912. Theodore Roosevelt ran as a third (Progressive) party candidate when Taft was nominated as the Republican. Many Republicans felt that Taft was not progressive enough. This allowed Wilson who unified the Democratic Party behind him to win the presidency. Wilson went on to win the presidency again in 1916 under the slogan 'He kept us out of War'. The United States then entered World War I in 1917 after Wilson was inaugurated for a 2nd term. It will be interesting to see who is truly the unifier this time.
As we saw last night, America wants more killing and reason has nothing to do with it. I couldn't be more disgusted with these spineless wimps.
There is no unifier, that's the problem. The country is nothing more than the chicken with its head chopped off which I saw when I was a kid. It has no idea where it's going and how could it when it has no head.
I know I wrote a Liddy response as I've listened to him multiple times. No idea where it ended up, tho.
Post a Comment