The Daily Mail, easily one of the sleaziest tabloids on the Internet, in one of their characteristically swinish attacks accused Melania Trump of selling herself for sex at some stage in her life. Even if she did then so what as anyone has to survive and people generally do better at anything without Americans issuing their proclamations of plastic morality on the matter. In any case, there's no evidence Trump did anything so she sued and won. The Daily Mail backed down.
Fair enough and they should have but here's the initial description in the article in Russia Today, a rag I normally respect ... but not this time. The article is not credited so the slime who wrote it remains as anonymous as the one within the Daily Mail who wrote the original offense.
It seems the Daily Mail forgot they were talking about the most litigious happy family around when they published allegations that Melania Trump was involved in sex work. The article was retracted after she filed a complaint in court.
It seems Melania has taken up the Trump pastime of suing publications that display the family in a disparaging light.
Fair enough and they should have but here's the initial description in the article in Russia Today, a rag I normally respect ... but not this time. The article is not credited so the slime who wrote it remains as anonymous as the one within the Daily Mail who wrote the original offense.
It seems the Daily Mail forgot they were talking about the most litigious happy family around when they published allegations that Melania Trump was involved in sex work. The article was retracted after she filed a complaint in court.
It seems Melania has taken up the Trump pastime of suing publications that display the family in a disparaging light.
Here at the Rockhouse, we see little difference between this article and the original offense. Read the muckracking trash if you like at RT: Melania Trump sues Daily Mail into submission.
Maybe the RT journo was pleased by his or her personal knowledge of the meaning of 'litigious' or of finding it in a thesaurus (smirk).
Note: use of the word was sloppy and awkward. It would have better stated as 'the most litigious family' since 'litigious happy' doesn't make any sense. Go back to Journo 101, Junior.
Note: use of the word was sloppy and awkward. It would have better stated as 'the most litigious family' since 'litigious happy' doesn't make any sense. Go back to Journo 101, Junior.
No comments:
Post a Comment